{"id":"W2130233214","doi":"10.1037/a0024492","title":"Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1–L2 intermixing.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Cognate; Psychology; Salience (neuroscience); Linguistics; Reading (process); Psycholinguistics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Facilitation; Sentence; Word recognition; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Cognitive psychology; Cognition","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002712883,0.0002690368,0.0002961146,0.0002853816,0.000201539,0.0005134529,0.0001430554,0.0003343519,0.002072781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002311176,0.0002558386,0.0001164223,0.000169093,0.0003528343,0.0005169851,0.0004999271,0.000405265,0.0002360725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003294167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002982774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002810739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007489685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999833,0.00003512325,0.00001084492,0.00005938554,0.00003359115,0.00002805335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999054,0.0004464184,0.0002357848,0.00004803598,0.00007690241,0.0001388265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004887606,0.0003205231,0.02466401,0.0001887094,0.00004807753,0.000297791,0.001935838,0.00006645919,0.9544916,0.0001392194,0.0001535486,0.01280666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001639372,0.0009333462,0.9356859,0.00002144245,0.00007176847,0.0005261549,0.0006794673,0.0006792111,0.06013071,0.0004341132,0.0006435972,0.00003023634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986873,0.0001037929,0.0001617732,0.00002360864,0.000003333818,0.000008822376,0.00005927739,0.000009767548,0.00094226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985201,0.00009696416,0.0004258085,0.00004042272,0.000005145037,0.00003241626,0.0001165468,0.00002409961,0.0007386096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002810739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006934166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05105216601639643,"score_gpt":0.3582730672593718,"score_spread":0.3072209012429754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}