{"id":"W2130276110","doi":"10.1109/isvlsi.2006.1","title":"A \"Soft++\" eFPGA Physical Design Approach with Case Studies in 180nm and 90nm","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"CMC Microsystems","keywords":"Computer science; Application-specific integrated circuit; Place and route; Benchmark (surveying); Physical design; Field-programmable gate array; Design flow; Embedded system; Overhead (engineering); Computer architecture; Set (abstract data type); Integrated circuit design; Soft error; Electronic engineering; Computer hardware; Circuit design; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000484335,0.0003761908,0.0001427231,0.0003357299,0.0004213256,0.0007940302,0.0006469304,0.0006150713,0.002981019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008289397,0.000179567,0.0002638303,0.0003617402,0.0007165986,0.0006147185,0.0004336387,0.0004047453,0.000293452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006174295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006252952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00159419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003058959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995911,0.0001669442,0.00001474203,0.0000365407,0.0001432173,0.00004746279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996403,0.0001658677,0.00004384849,0.00007977476,0.00005296375,0.00001718475],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002264253,0.000218948,0.003329486,0.0006840031,0.00006395566,0.002941496,0.0006050019,0.581667,0.03950232,0.1266436,0.004364219,0.2397536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001821184,0.001158442,0.003640551,0.0001122118,0.0000708811,0.003106156,0.0004440993,0.8392412,0.03942975,0.05253785,0.06002052,0.00005614091],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3195394,0.001086491,0.5976137,0.0009544179,0.0000768141,0.0003292057,0.000251986,0.001218932,0.07892913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.770332,0.0003064062,0.2223333,0.000157485,0.00000960789,0.0001417546,0.00006823694,0.00007251818,0.00657855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002981019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009972453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03175765441955979,"score_gpt":0.2438601730406543,"score_spread":0.2121025186210945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}