{"id":"W2130344283","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00146.x","title":"GAME THEORY FOR PLAYING GAMES: SOPHISTICATION IN A NEGATIVE‐EXTERNALITY EXPERIMENT","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Economics; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics; Risk dominance; Externality; Profit maximization; Moral hazard; Game theory; Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Maximization; Experimental economics; Strategic interaction; Utility maximization; Profit (economics); Best response; Incentive; Epsilon-equilibrium","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007428499,0.0005207254,0.0003992348,0.0003302919,0.0004554383,0.001759093,0.0006299897,0.0009869721,0.00479299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02437574,0.0003088479,0.0002116824,0.0002558266,0.002100136,0.00189556,0.001134298,0.00151288,0.0003664255],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000500578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003933766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002312212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002449564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966369,0.002254212,0.0001975365,0.0003233747,0.0004532664,0.0001346813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746767,0.01601554,0.005311838,0.002620041,0.0004285864,0.000947195],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02910367,0.05705252,0.139405,0.001693775,0.0007066947,0.001123196,0.0229824,0.02768462,0.2048223,0.4016119,0.007138302,0.1066755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01040229,0.05322893,0.2635612,0.0002949868,0.0004266813,0.001710655,0.00529233,0.1809063,0.03752515,0.4222085,0.024045,0.0003977985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988025,0.00002389821,0.005383868,0.0004308748,0.00001514652,0.0002301709,0.0000417449,0.00001780638,0.005831343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914669,0.00003895219,0.006707486,0.0002433927,0.00001795053,0.0004486311,0.00003526216,0.0000115337,0.001029964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007428499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03928614,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08465574278075104,"score_gpt":0.4001727410503848,"score_spread":0.3155169982696338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}