{"id":"W2130344283","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00146.x","title":"GAME THEORY FOR PLAYING GAMES: SOPHISTICATION IN A NEGATIVE‐EXTERNALITY EXPERIMENT","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Economics; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics; Risk dominance; Externality; Profit maximization; Moral hazard; Game theory; Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Maximization; Experimental economics; Strategic interaction; Utility maximization; Profit (economics); Best response; Incentive; Epsilon-equilibrium","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008697606,0.0001280934,0.0002255479,0.00007656588,0.0002293236,0.00006310936,0.0002109396,0.00007262175,0.0001000817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006931533,0.0001508884,0.00007701383,0.00003194503,0.0003078127,0.0003034949,0.00003264054,0.00007008802,0.00008066499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001297114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001039243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005674313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002722906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988379,0.0001053852,0.0003529681,0.0003350854,0.00004807315,0.0003205449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994097,0.0001941553,0.0001411222,0.0001720624,0.0000156441,0.00006732136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002823675,0.0002937266,0.009419604,0.00001022385,0.00003374524,0.000002929121,0.2334663,0.0001363039,0.002971982,0.7341841,0.001042733,0.018156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005205531,0.0006575903,0.08510714,0.0001784354,0.00005531621,0.000002645105,0.1773704,0.001348503,0.02297355,0.6880893,0.01712944,0.001882179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767377,0.0003475794,0.0004152485,0.0007981082,0.001130809,0.0006530396,0.00001228891,0.00005512977,0.01985005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973877,0.00006060185,0.001006453,0.0003907578,0.0006371727,0.0001729959,0.000005731747,0.00001007027,0.0003284805],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07568754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6153052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08465574278075104,"score_gpt":0.4001727410503848,"score_spread":0.3155169982696338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}