{"id":"W2130565916","doi":"10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009003311.x","title":"Natural Recover y and Restoration Potential of Severely Disturbed Talus Vegetation at Niagara Falls: Assessment Using a Reference System","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Restoration Ecology","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Escarpment; Ordination; Detrended correspondence analysis; Vegetation (pathology); Species richness; Disturbance (geology); Hydrology (agriculture); Quadrat; Physical geography; Environmental science; Plant community; Natural (archaeology); Ecology; Geography; Geology; Forestry; Archaeology; Geomorphology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004639723,0.0001606585,0.0002496822,0.00007875523,0.0001994092,0.00003260485,0.0001085608,0.0001709297,0.00006868836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006672447,0.0001596307,0.00003346002,0.0002051586,0.0001058693,0.0005493221,0.0001092198,0.0001311259,0.00007586151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001598788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004045548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004609823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003628516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982763,0.0004180268,0.0004373605,0.0003263317,0.0003206646,0.0002213027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991292,0.00008880402,0.0004412397,0.0002287473,0.00004404322,0.00006797383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008124478,0.0003201029,0.4060488,0.000419644,0.0001082607,0.0001185127,0.001202794,0.04737996,0.5365875,0.001168502,0.001068217,0.004765184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006583228,0.0002679999,0.8014544,0.00004384132,0.00003823829,0.0001625418,0.00007791724,0.1961076,0.000345967,0.00003208322,0.0006123868,0.0001987851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960867,0.00005992308,0.001372361,0.00005992091,0.0007097036,0.0005216702,0.000005565765,0.00004910364,0.001135023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985829,0.00001446007,0.0009850636,0.00002938707,0.00005352483,0.00002896165,0.00005619209,0.00001575281,0.00023375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5362416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6509549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01154545468214527,"score_gpt":0.2490096771544956,"score_spread":0.2374642224723503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}