{"id":"W2130679745","doi":"10.1109/iembs.2007.4352939","title":"Comparison of analytical and algebraic 2D tomographic reconstruction approaches for irregularly sampled microCT data","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conference proceedings","topic":"Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Detector; Projection (relational algebra); Iterative reconstruction; Algebraic Reconstruction Technique; Data acquisition; Tomographic reconstruction; Computer science; Physics; Computer vision; Scanner; Tomography; Optics; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005742112,0.0001131871,0.0003318381,0.0001399469,0.00006147388,0.00003341134,0.0001907124,0.0001046858,0.00002160281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002680281,0.00009830793,0.00003955613,0.0002355902,0.0003754997,0.0001283019,0.00009139801,0.0001668331,5.252084e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001121246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005269033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001132354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002645377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989136,0.000002260832,0.0003702657,0.0003618212,0.0001498904,0.0002022015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991583,0.00007401553,0.0001421562,0.0002116723,0.0002502692,0.000163633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003225087,0.000486594,0.4194359,0.001293356,0.0001520868,6.87765e-7,0.001012839,1.454595e-8,0.08324143,0.1346288,0.01085212,0.3485737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006928961,0.002211673,0.2466683,0.00249436,0.002475725,0.0008252786,0.01150028,0.4676211,0.1460136,0.06476302,0.04694874,0.001548867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8486109,0.0001430843,0.1465512,0.002950238,0.00002372901,0.0007321424,0.00002174977,0.000103995,0.0008629775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9091834,0.00002601034,0.09050866,0.00006247588,0.00006111369,0.00002701894,0.0000765985,0.00001009379,0.00004466325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4676211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4008881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2088555533725836,"score_gpt":0.3902511713889912,"score_spread":0.1813956180164076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}