{"id":"W2130682757","doi":"10.1139/t09-004","title":"Kinematic response analysis of piled foundations under seismic excitation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri","keywords":"Bending moment; Pile; Subsoil; Kinematics; Parametric statistics; Structural engineering; Finite element method; Geotechnical engineering; Bending; Geology; Time domain; Engineering; Computer science; Mathematics; Soil water; Physics; Soil science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000148128,0.0002910935,0.000258488,0.0004780531,0.0001281473,0.0002264596,0.0003231834,0.0003296797,0.001706095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007265887,0.0001653805,0.0002028726,0.000274881,0.0003004433,0.0001851371,0.000265937,0.0001322496,0.00020611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001850836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001505318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001161726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001167315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998857,0.0000184194,0.000004201721,0.00001534278,0.0000485374,0.00002782825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997429,0.0001160548,0.00004934847,0.00003141495,0.00004366486,0.00001664545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004999933,0.00006010088,0.007122843,0.0001865798,0.0000387844,0.0006555596,0.0001911952,0.6875432,0.269177,0.001020819,0.0001411697,0.03336277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001130172,0.0003232782,0.0272499,0.00001350356,0.00002426375,0.0002879116,0.0002131104,0.9201726,0.05084006,0.000398706,0.0004396219,0.00002572155],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705856,0.00005183707,0.0273993,0.00001561048,0.00000357281,0.00001087462,0.00007688088,0.00008832427,0.001768045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989408,0.00002230209,0.0007449488,0.000001567302,6.632412e-7,0.000002386345,0.0000246085,0.000003909608,0.0002589417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001706095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005707443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01087903346256564,"score_gpt":0.2240271121859755,"score_spread":0.2131480787234099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}