{"id":"W2130734316","doi":"10.1256/003590002320603449","title":"The impact of various potential‐vorticity anomalies on multiple frontal cyclogenesis events","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","topic":"Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Aeronautics and Space Administration; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Cyclogenesis; Potential vorticity; Extratropical cyclone; Geology; Climatology; Cyclone (programming language); Baroclinity; Frontogenesis; Anomaly (physics); Trough (economics); Advection; Atmospheric sciences; Vorticity; Meteorology; Mesoscale meteorology; Physics; Vortex","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007095307,0.0007850571,0.0005789715,0.0003102666,0.0005541264,0.0009086668,0.0005248815,0.0007872532,0.001418728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003550628,0.0004047428,0.0007698467,0.0001959865,0.0006213721,0.0004219136,0.0004954039,0.0007658927,0.00009997377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005852202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005887061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02477893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01413537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999764,0.00007137723,0.00001578038,0.00003950371,0.00003059947,0.00007871168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986585,0.0009112676,0.0001240694,0.00006645967,0.0000904186,0.0001491423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006381075,0.0003273997,0.0497024,0.00006041417,0.000304567,0.0003652434,0.00004304121,0.9348543,0.008703197,0.0005176314,0.0003971631,0.00408659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002624805,0.0008390972,0.03121548,0.00001947135,0.0001450014,0.0000628598,0.0001346372,0.961563,0.005092657,0.0002579504,0.0003745465,0.00003274362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983537,0.00004579705,0.0005209104,0.00004561894,0.00001694376,0.00001567018,0.0001945071,0.00004123262,0.0007657683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994217,0.00002761696,0.0002576686,0.00001963851,0.000004198698,0.000008896616,0.0001715737,0.000007894663,0.00008072279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02477893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04926938,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01675581458897201,"score_gpt":0.2290689515144991,"score_spread":0.2123131369255271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}