{"id":"W2130746650","doi":"10.1016/s1386-6532(02)00134-8","title":"Assessment of precision and concordance of quantitative mitochondrial DNA assays: a collaborative international quality assurance study","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Virology","topic":"Mitochondrial Function and Pathology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"AIDS Vancouver","funders":"","keywords":"Mitochondrial DNA; Nuclear DNA; Concordance; DNA; Biology; Coefficient of variation; Molecular biology; Concordance correlation coefficient; Quality assurance; Replicate; Genetics; Computational biology; Chemistry; Gene; Chromatography; Medicine; Statistics; External quality assessment; Mathematics; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1586802,0.001141778,0.001857587,0.003108417,0.002418625,0.002820326,0.002736432,0.002728177,0.0007054466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1881486,0.001166401,0.001640434,0.00304665,0.004057928,0.001287193,0.002654672,0.001875199,0.0004541466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002925971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002833665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00568608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006544158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7959479,0.1019929,0.02339667,0.0203646,0.05586912,0.002428729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6232557,0.1756728,0.03488672,0.06738491,0.09517881,0.003621036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005190029,0.001138558,0.8603941,0.0007166206,0.003346314,0.0002094738,0.01772751,0.003471034,0.03655759,0.001789051,0.001486122,0.06797364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007655735,0.007737108,0.925752,0.0002487948,0.002416468,0.00119932,0.001994821,0.009509375,0.04204192,0.0007745472,0.007351409,0.0002087171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9165721,0.002409723,0.07277299,0.0003887937,0.0002040168,0.001287525,0.0007681506,0.0003701688,0.00522655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763427,0.0001838545,0.02128216,0.0001787386,0.00005815825,0.0004501233,0.0007814044,0.0001376843,0.0005850499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1586802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8391909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05810850636541708,"score_gpt":0.4508436841929443,"score_spread":0.3927351778275273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}