{"id":"W2130803473","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v44i2.183858","title":"When intentions meet reality: Consonance and dissonance in teacher approaches to peer assessment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia; Universitetet i Tromsø","keywords":"Consonance and dissonance; Cognitive dissonance; Peer assessment; Psychology; Peer evaluation; Mathematics education; Peer feedback; Teaching method; Pedagogy; Higher education; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001108865,0.00006828314,0.0001282139,0.0001823557,0.000165889,0.0001350135,0.000173172,0.00005003448,0.0002076673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001645671,0.00006711693,0.0000285796,0.0001803514,0.0001046886,0.0002352373,0.000007690484,0.0001234675,0.000003150415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000377547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001669087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01635225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.147287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989992,0.0001689665,0.0002155241,0.0001135119,0.000289277,0.0002134858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991443,0.000045451,0.0001202058,0.00008302016,0.0002290045,0.0003780544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002982476,0.00007783839,0.7224402,0.000006609858,0.00001475315,0.000001116322,0.01892159,0.00000429748,0.00001148155,0.1009066,0.1457164,0.01189619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008297978,0.00001649384,0.5510443,0.0000380096,0.000008235802,6.612923e-7,0.002862514,0.000002862502,5.213082e-7,0.003913782,0.441974,0.00005569749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6670805,0.001132433,0.0003322525,0.1919856,0.003384728,0.0003966019,0.000005997947,0.000009041189,0.1356728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656377,0.00001275211,0.001293926,0.0004756233,0.0004833091,0.00001225212,0.000002130325,0.000006125128,0.03207614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2985572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1055719275096799,"score_gpt":0.3696201744864187,"score_spread":0.2640482469767387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}