{"id":"W2130927993","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2015.02.001","title":"‘Cyber Gurus’: A rhetorical analysis of the language of cybersecurity specialists and the implications for security policy and critical infrastructure protection","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government Information Quarterly","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Rhetorical question; Computer security; Critical infrastructure; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Public relations; Critical infrastructure protection; Computer science; Internet privacy; Political science; Business; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007049977,0.00008170235,0.0002039304,0.00005006708,0.0003465225,0.00006229405,0.000130408,0.00007312097,0.000007029127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001028237,0.00005338171,0.0001047354,0.0005024906,0.0006947135,0.0004427194,0.00004208972,0.00008816869,3.26875e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001660648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009526387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003634299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003497744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988607,0.0001404916,0.0003232776,0.00008139702,0.000459082,0.0001350411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990988,0.0002380135,0.0002381068,0.0001656121,0.0001944284,0.00006498601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007405905,0.00002233311,0.001881103,0.00002671713,0.000119544,1.169271e-8,0.3470865,0.000002954897,0.000005381397,0.6428736,0.0004817231,0.00742605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00326281,0.0003134219,0.3288223,0.00003915713,0.001176153,0.00000348444,0.4535271,0.001175169,0.00006989089,0.1559387,0.05531588,0.0003558829],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9545199,0.0001499104,0.002092903,0.02522322,0.0002490075,0.001602336,0.0008666203,0.00003011662,0.01526594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995826,0.00001832602,0.00005465047,0.0001596529,0.00009863009,0.00005850351,0.000005677466,0.000001921659,0.00002003367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4869349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5493997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01468187051191983,"score_gpt":0.300814443530694,"score_spread":0.2861325730187742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}