{"id":"W2130927993","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2015.02.001","title":"‘Cyber Gurus’: A rhetorical analysis of the language of cybersecurity specialists and the implications for security policy and critical infrastructure protection","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government Information Quarterly","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Rhetorical question; Computer security; Critical infrastructure; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Public relations; Critical infrastructure protection; Computer science; Internet privacy; Political science; Business; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009833843,0.0006337986,0.0005262157,0.004938046,0.01051704,0.01250224,0.002527627,0.007190244,0.006544369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02521334,0.0004270807,0.0003539828,0.005410612,0.04935936,0.01766414,0.004996111,0.007750412,0.000502793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009229698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005701702,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005421835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004653285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9848786,0.01214086,0.0002413448,0.0005686592,0.001452401,0.0007179969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9685281,0.02684303,0.001390902,0.0009024337,0.001656807,0.0006786651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001659893,0.000008842714,0.000176826,0.00003478521,0.000002070876,0.00008307211,0.05932561,0.00006358065,0.0001211096,0.935128,0.002939389,0.002100148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004108734,0.00005076693,0.001595823,0.0005234586,0.00002001213,0.0004099253,0.1552662,0.00313324,0.0008977343,0.6746996,0.1633126,0.00004944084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2063837,0.00484935,0.04280759,0.1905786,0.001360019,0.0001280209,0.000206462,0.0001916919,0.5534946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884101,0.0003819058,0.003020955,0.003889257,0.0002147428,0.00005054325,0.00004327566,0.00009588963,0.00389323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06696653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01468187051191983,"score_gpt":0.300814443530694,"score_spread":0.2861325730187742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}