{"id":"W2131082250","doi":"10.1123/jab.22.2.120","title":"Response Surface Optimization for Joint Contact Model Evaluation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","topic":"Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques","field":"Medicine","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Biorem Technologies (Canada)","funders":"U.S. National Library of Medicine; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Joint (building); Contact area; Contact force; Range (aeronautics); Finite element method; Position (finance); Response surface methodology; Contact analysis; Computer science; Materials science; Structural engineering; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001804861,0.00009913824,0.0002951498,0.0002180547,0.00005980357,0.00002071572,0.00004537499,0.0001323073,0.00004054393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004383241,0.00007760266,0.0001535499,0.0001436582,0.00001527449,0.0000654995,0.000009799439,0.0001081914,8.87671e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001934116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000269922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001601494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.663688e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988173,0.00002008255,0.0006089897,0.0001001206,0.0003353385,0.0001181219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985994,0.00003744404,0.0005609714,0.0001104183,0.0006353807,0.00005637187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005834158,0.0001344175,0.000001698648,0.00004585714,0.0000553264,0.000001741799,0.00003951003,0.04835828,0.9252841,0.004217825,0.004416958,0.01161013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00169197,0.0005229181,0.00000474034,0.00004068861,0.0001366738,0.00009394753,0.00008589168,0.6261123,0.359786,0.01046546,0.0009832721,0.00007610352],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2882096,0.00007782988,0.7094926,0.0008681731,0.0002242924,0.0006822701,0.00001347235,0.00003643051,0.0003952508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7297348,0.00004026882,0.2698542,0.0001235242,0.0001340921,0.00000814883,0.00001361916,0.00001843065,0.0000728466],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5777541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3164545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02386910769180096,"score_gpt":0.2878568785385099,"score_spread":0.2639877708467089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}