{"id":"W2131258498","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2006.04.010","title":"Inter-temporal preference for flexibility and risky choice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Preference; Mathematical economics; Normative; Consistency (knowledge bases); Ex-ante; Representation (politics); Key (lock); Subjective expected utility; Time consistency; Econometrics; Economics; Revealed preference; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Actuarial science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002910794,0.0003072998,0.0004013775,0.0006055009,0.0002858827,0.00208549,0.0005023384,0.001042041,0.008331562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02200092,0.0002513408,0.0006853088,0.0005359892,0.000972454,0.002764084,0.0008229762,0.001300487,0.0002164528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004958823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002672972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000467378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006896487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992525,0.0002861752,0.00006573205,0.0001389014,0.0001540081,0.0001025868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979041,0.0144798,0.002941476,0.001839954,0.000510593,0.001187258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004536957,0.00090989,0.1336765,0.000465939,0.00100199,0.002539363,0.002068668,0.05739938,0.02419231,0.6785147,0.001097576,0.09359688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001758651,0.0005626563,0.1016505,0.00004666338,0.0001988947,0.001248762,0.000742609,0.1010193,0.001442384,0.7917825,0.00101378,0.0001160912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9466267,0.0003070017,0.04372529,0.0004765228,0.00002887048,0.00001656624,0.00008735081,0.00002739764,0.008704314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973384,0.00006362313,0.002019056,0.00002266315,0.00001760259,0.000007613532,0.00003194062,0.000005821759,0.0004932264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008331562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02787185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2227079667466692,"score_gpt":0.4046448403129322,"score_spread":0.181936873566263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}