{"id":"W2131259125","doi":"10.1177/104973230001000308","title":"Evaluating Interpretive Inquiry: Reviewing the Validity Debate and Opening the Dialogue","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":951,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Foundationalism; Epistemology; Lifeworld; Field (mathematics); External validity; Trustworthiness; Qualitative research; Ontology; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Social science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3761952,0.0004493676,0.002025991,0.0005715187,0.003394076,0.001171879,0.002372696,0.0001817146,0.001330349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05324278,0.0001914916,0.0003638086,0.003186913,0.001355579,0.000451912,0.0009575284,0.002948734,0.00108725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006707384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005104302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000270593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007957742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.812084,0.1728331,0.003708076,0.001528043,0.008469529,0.001377227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8344231,0.159446,0.001743685,0.001894422,0.002099738,0.0003930367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001170636,0.00001372523,0.000002776512,0.001473656,0.00003348584,0.000001157283,0.1282162,0.000002860528,2.12312e-8,0.0013349,0.004806342,0.8641031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001089157,0.0004298811,0.00001925026,0.01183127,0.00004096306,0.0000166865,0.0447877,0.0007096003,8.927292e-8,0.005513892,0.9363356,0.0002061786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001105915,0.9834147,0.000304228,0.008291163,0.000393175,0.004452936,0.00007133531,0.000018573,0.002943294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003605435,0.9951425,0.0004701236,0.0009978937,0.0003733441,0.001202245,0.00003701929,0.00004068649,0.001375688],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9315292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999865,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.975849557890781,"score_gpt":0.8206803585145628,"score_spread":0.1551691993762182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}