{"id":"W2131291252","doi":"10.1139/x09-024","title":"Spatial variability of stand-scale residuals in Ontario’s boreal forest fires","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Forest Research Institute","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Taiga; Boreal; Environmental science; Snag; Spatial variability; Physical geography; Spatial ecology; Scale (ratio); Geography; Ecology; Forestry; Habitat; Cartography; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003934002,0.0001068472,0.0001677584,0.0004566266,0.0003957302,0.0004324688,0.0003094274,0.0001258143,0.0004407138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001547529,0.0001357267,0.0001509509,0.0005394074,0.0003477401,0.0001630743,0.0002745162,0.0001390064,0.00005338971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002039703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009819191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7332649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9109668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997706,0.00002583332,0.00001966503,0.00006178338,0.0000709063,0.00005127829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989578,0.0002267708,0.0003190947,0.00008930513,0.000290346,0.0001166535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001292153,0.00001539571,0.9927388,0.000009508234,0.00003751606,0.00005607941,0.0006131704,0.0004249348,0.001915968,0.0000295298,0.0001350217,0.003894808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.406286e-7,0.000004081829,0.9996118,8.249702e-7,0.000002402084,0.00001217278,0.00009510711,0.0001733552,0.00004159485,0.000003527603,0.00005301737,0.00000144402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994889,0.00003113897,0.0000618146,0.000006063949,8.109744e-7,0.000001811344,0.000222069,0.000002440677,0.0001847898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994399,0.00001879264,0.00008132589,0.0000023779,6.502417e-7,0.000002309999,0.0003127618,0.000001390688,0.0001404694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2667351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5366119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01963509949598959,"score_gpt":0.2707148280262583,"score_spread":0.2510797285302688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}