{"id":"W2131339008","doi":"10.1080/02755947.2013.869283","title":"Application of the Genetic Mark–Recapture Technique for Run Size Estimation of Yukon River Chinook Salmon","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Escapement; Chinook wind; Fishery; Mark and recapture; Stock (firearms); Oncorhynchus; Population; Stock assessment; Biology; Population size; Effective population size; Ecology; Fishing; Environmental science; Statistics; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geography; Mathematics; Genetic variation; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006730873,0.0001887926,0.0001523138,0.0008291213,0.0002126354,0.000231352,0.0003445617,0.0001504054,0.0003128859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001572711,0.0001259066,0.0001845865,0.0005758516,0.0001356605,0.0001463082,0.0002412666,0.0001521872,0.000106856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000346474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004729074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03090674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062455,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996719,0.0001182958,0.00002854868,0.00008016456,0.00008450583,0.00001646318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993668,0.0001569001,0.0001535485,0.00006851281,0.0002310846,0.00002309307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001483673,0.00004119788,0.6858706,0.00007824801,0.0002490911,0.0002715957,0.0002528173,0.03255714,0.05492777,0.0004995364,0.0005530202,0.2245506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001279963,0.0001613133,0.8318546,0.00001876884,0.00007962206,0.0003061062,0.00016734,0.155147,0.01054355,0.0003451862,0.001312472,0.00005115999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9055295,0.0001649588,0.09257864,0.00005013137,0.00001436699,0.00004513667,0.000410225,0.0001959952,0.001011015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9460278,0.0000505681,0.05329059,0.00001561545,0.000006951685,0.00003277625,0.0002278562,0.00001526265,0.0003325315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0614537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.002860474909019715,"score_gpt":0.1860278848775102,"score_spread":0.1831674099684905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}