{"id":"W2131383338","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivr161","title":"Is cardiac magnetic resonance imaging assessment of myocardial viability useful for predicting which patients with impaired ventricles might benefit from revascularization?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery","topic":"Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Revascularization; Cardiology; Magnetic resonance imaging; Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Context (archaeology); Ventricle; Internal medicine; Cardiac imaging; Cardiomyopathy; Myocardial infarction; Radiology; Heart failure","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001835086,0.0007712795,0.004846919,0.0003986324,0.0001562003,0.00009031461,0.000124512,0.0002786643,0.00002402763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001511183,0.0006368851,0.004933733,0.0006229584,0.0001517119,0.0003148057,0.0001592723,0.0005366129,0.000003100139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003633743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006011057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000151502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001340695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954374,0.0007069664,0.001109142,0.001117389,0.00103452,0.0005945595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914405,0.004836679,0.0005789303,0.001309346,0.001543812,0.0002906853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001163608,0.0001519458,0.4224934,0.004976714,0.004491255,0.00001108875,0.00009427054,0.000002571472,1.567739e-7,7.099688e-7,0.00008107632,0.5675805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001003172,0.00009709,0.536359,0.02210843,0.04886087,0.0000482848,0.00007847365,0.00005717466,0.00003530283,0.00001776224,0.3904237,0.0009108225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0104232,0.9814636,0.00137588,0.00001576018,0.001329117,0.002747916,0.002457318,0.00006965124,0.0001175634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.128217,0.8660969,0.0009491067,0.00004578878,0.001126866,0.0006892419,0.002635969,0.0002260721,0.0000130393],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5666696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02439227407095433,"score_gpt":0.3115847361164596,"score_spread":0.2871924620455053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}