{"id":"W2131405895","doi":"10.22230/jem.2002v1n2a242","title":"Visual Resource Management in British Columbia - Part II: Partial cutting in the frontcountry: A win-win solution for short-term timber availability and aesthetics?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Clearcutting; Logging; Constraint (computer-aided design); Resource (disambiguation); Term (time); Perception; Forest management; Christian ministry; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Business; Engineering; Economics; Environmental science; Geography; Agroforestry; Psychology; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002645618,0.0001818712,0.0001645509,0.0004208554,0.003545297,0.003012571,0.0009429003,0.0004993115,0.004879863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000639327,0.0001368598,0.000123035,0.000966547,0.001243491,0.0005711722,0.0009133784,0.0006423714,0.0002412604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01319826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01187013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8684975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9815486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995491,0.00005194659,0.000008004909,0.00004900932,0.0001009989,0.0002408689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996567,0.00003585865,0.00003398958,0.0000181239,0.0001077173,0.000147677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004445953,0.0006082191,0.3384852,0.000748684,0.0000912846,0.003241619,0.008752556,0.005091504,0.01723476,0.01502445,0.02221308,0.588064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004306901,0.0002590939,0.8675599,0.0003499261,0.00005925876,0.0007571433,0.05996725,0.004332302,0.002048637,0.003654875,0.06089184,0.00007677289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494254,0.001233463,0.0006355238,0.002069894,0.00002034885,0.00005550791,0.0001402432,0.00002157466,0.04639809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880195,0.000610122,0.0009919814,0.0002892621,0.000004081638,0.00001845345,0.00008437013,0.00000787474,0.009974175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1315025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2645538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01291027658381947,"score_gpt":0.215858651061484,"score_spread":0.2029483744776645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}