{"id":"W2131520815","doi":"10.5430/afr.v4n2p123","title":"Can Anyone Read Accounting Footnotes Well Enough to Understand Them?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting and Finance Research","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); CLARITY; Accounting; Newspaper; Index (typography); Spelling; Government (linguistics); Pension; Business; Population; Carelessness; Affect (linguistics); Set (abstract data type); Readability; Suite; Actuarial science; Finance; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics; Sociology; Law; Advertising; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002233814,0.0003239407,0.0002570496,0.00132061,0.000752721,0.003148356,0.0002838552,0.0007385376,0.01099899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03087213,0.0001611704,0.0001915783,0.001014378,0.0009083974,0.004087423,0.0005981956,0.0006990936,0.004596832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005444047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006021389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002372436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003898539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989002,0.0003441221,0.0001299438,0.0001069242,0.0003904799,0.0001284427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838864,0.007287862,0.003769238,0.0008099015,0.003437052,0.0008095625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004838303,0.0003517259,0.2067158,0.0009328542,0.00005094925,0.001809887,0.05671182,0.0002621814,0.006997314,0.007019374,0.158024,0.5606403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004565891,0.0006014462,0.3962805,0.002072439,0.00009003167,0.003590846,0.1140301,0.0009006331,0.005694197,0.01864456,0.4578415,0.0002079175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8575966,0.005993018,0.005682889,0.02426874,0.001002939,0.0001751024,0.001902446,0.0004459047,0.1029324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662374,0.005558672,0.006296576,0.004941686,0.0005541045,0.0000504797,0.001372567,0.0001074906,0.01488106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01099899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03679532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07295665587438116,"score_gpt":0.2968572217732782,"score_spread":0.223900565898897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}