{"id":"W2131702758","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01745.x","title":"Expert and trainee determinations of rhetorical relevance in referral and consultation letters","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Technology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Referral; Rhetorical question; Medical education; Psychology; Medicine; Family medicine; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02814504,0.0002411088,0.000237124,0.002381759,0.001763569,0.003291121,0.0004778666,0.001377333,0.001982861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1959572,0.0002734223,0.0001303063,0.0007870042,0.001996906,0.001610045,0.002269211,0.0010023,0.0004484827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002268139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00226241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007125427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001469684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.958504,0.03132916,0.001720647,0.001191859,0.005932649,0.00132169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7555442,0.1996102,0.02327678,0.002692734,0.01516851,0.00370757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001831432,0.0004529114,0.2360224,0.00118588,0.00007701494,0.00332331,0.5695986,0.0009246991,0.01644467,0.00467019,0.003835257,0.1616336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001943281,0.002128483,0.5346475,0.001474569,0.0001688078,0.006866498,0.3803316,0.006669131,0.02436642,0.01018099,0.03269416,0.0002775916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888178,0.0002062275,0.002440889,0.0006582455,0.00001962722,0.00010428,0.00003256011,0.00001769648,0.007702675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968454,0.00008321268,0.001980551,0.0002644746,0.0000269861,0.00006562469,0.00002251469,0.000006842562,0.0007043222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02814504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1488469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0190074810755506,"score_gpt":0.309192549168212,"score_spread":0.2901850680926614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}