{"id":"W2131736799","doi":"10.1139/f08-050","title":"A geostatistical method for assessing biomassof tuna aggregations around moored fish aggregating devices with star acoustic surveys","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tuna; Environmental science; Daytime; Standard deviation; Fishery; Kriging; Biomass (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Spatial variability; Scale (ratio); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Oceanography; Mathematics; Atmospheric sciences; Geography; Geology; Biology; Cartography; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002193949,0.000622655,0.000599747,0.003268328,0.0004768333,0.0005040339,0.0005975144,0.0003297655,0.001127146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006346146,0.0004409947,0.001063207,0.002544972,0.0003197887,0.0003431642,0.0005460867,0.0004023024,0.0002282534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006049806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001548804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01852269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02238601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984793,0.000655867,0.0001564286,0.0002437117,0.0004024424,0.00006223072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973009,0.001431633,0.0003997818,0.0002770441,0.0005414647,0.00004916595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005628961,0.0004399681,0.1800954,0.000487611,0.001205046,0.0002545323,0.0006567022,0.3081087,0.02033172,0.008199779,0.002393394,0.4772643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004344259,0.0002386489,0.05193627,0.00002243435,0.00007174128,0.000183253,0.0001989247,0.9389626,0.004432439,0.001638529,0.002211683,0.00006003448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.120569,0.00004546139,0.8769769,0.00002715685,0.00001797386,0.0002597222,0.000827894,0.0008651463,0.0004107535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4127843,0.00005138388,0.5843346,0.00001352923,0.00001184123,0.0006673046,0.001559241,0.00007837686,0.0004992978],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01852269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03682971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04257533107564705,"score_gpt":0.2895623629522693,"score_spread":0.2469870318766223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}