{"id":"W2131853211","doi":"10.1017/s0008423906050529","title":"Effect of Economic Conditions on Government Popularity: The Canadian Provincial Case","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Welfare economics; Chamber of Deputies; Economic rent; Economics; Public administration; Law; Philosophy; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002454864,0.0002754253,0.0007787591,0.002896105,0.00310397,0.002476197,0.001196364,0.0006414326,0.00526667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01659452,0.0002172434,0.0008395143,0.007332334,0.001758983,0.000886065,0.0009949281,0.0008516475,0.0002565401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02336622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01514147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9752265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9765478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976901,0.0003656777,0.0001124267,0.0002449396,0.0006209327,0.0009659891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878835,0.004656637,0.002737329,0.0008164647,0.002676936,0.001229184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002455853,0.00005711422,0.9723662,0.00004777313,0.0001150817,0.0005951672,0.001045207,0.007009904,0.0001865351,0.005725433,0.0008993435,0.01170663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003291684,0.00006466291,0.9783319,0.00002892867,0.00009135706,0.0001082719,0.002522382,0.01479699,0.0001482299,0.0009989314,0.002835129,0.00004020537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918168,0.000295262,0.0003128018,0.0004472333,0.000006145079,0.00003204805,0.001786601,0.00001335824,0.005289794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986523,0.0001263501,0.0001173407,0.000009937313,0.000004063663,0.000007260101,0.0004376531,0.000002148433,0.0006430235],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02477348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1695345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01850792069108336,"score_gpt":0.3290178190345622,"score_spread":0.3105098983434789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}