{"id":"W2131886002","doi":"10.1002/job.648","title":"The impact of non‐performance information on ratings of job performance: A policy‐capturing approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Akron","keywords":"Psychology; Performance appraisal; Job performance; Conscientiousness; Contextual performance; Variance (accounting); Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Multilevel model; Industrial and organizational psychology; Agreeableness; Employee Performance Appraisal; Big Five personality traits; Personality; Job satisfaction; Job design; Management; Computer science; Accounting; Business; Economics; Extraversion and introversion","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003581881,0.0001691179,0.0002472718,0.0005194819,0.0002290548,0.0001189746,0.000300019,0.00007446829,0.0001186435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002235387,0.0001137399,0.0001238065,0.001149401,0.00005640903,0.002065662,0.00003718593,0.0002042833,0.0000249833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001282062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000251518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002958146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.196914e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981891,0.000009151375,0.0008729302,0.00007687759,0.0006826647,0.0001693053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969587,0.0000333623,0.001189469,0.0001402147,0.001653568,0.00002465115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001458517,0.0002642597,0.9749335,0.00005084049,0.00003013301,6.830454e-7,0.0002187724,0.004875931,0.008772686,0.003006842,0.0008527772,0.006847729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007123759,0.0001659594,0.9943922,0.00005324829,0.00006413425,0.00002821663,0.0001088708,0.0008438289,0.003359863,0.00003489869,0.0001198836,0.0001165659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980085,0.00001381656,0.0002573673,0.000219745,0.0001418684,0.0001874521,0.000005520766,0.00001362685,0.001152127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988275,0.0000301001,0.0003592028,0.0001904121,0.000498837,0.000001945926,0.00002724336,0.00001675181,0.00004801449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01945866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4638178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00819061618418466,"score_gpt":0.2431691402726314,"score_spread":0.2349785240884468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}