{"id":"W2131886002","doi":"10.1002/job.648","title":"The impact of non‐performance information on ratings of job performance: A policy‐capturing approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Akron","keywords":"Psychology; Performance appraisal; Job performance; Conscientiousness; Contextual performance; Variance (accounting); Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Multilevel model; Industrial and organizational psychology; Agreeableness; Employee Performance Appraisal; Big Five personality traits; Personality; Job satisfaction; Job design; Management; Computer science; Accounting; Business; Economics; Extraversion and introversion","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1777406,0.0008493715,0.0007737166,0.002029266,0.001206554,0.004690801,0.001784103,0.001394005,0.001926878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4855845,0.0009866764,0.001073815,0.00217493,0.003352263,0.002937682,0.00334788,0.002247472,0.0003272094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004104252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002323191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002122971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001807166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.685204,0.2838157,0.00703607,0.004674347,0.01785733,0.001412618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2668628,0.6398176,0.05129053,0.03179183,0.009280308,0.0009569246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004422014,0.002027074,0.7015134,0.001213606,0.001214383,0.0002822172,0.0126559,0.01833291,0.007457863,0.04172427,0.001717112,0.2074393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003810664,0.004466261,0.7505025,0.0006399732,0.0009960957,0.0005012,0.004273009,0.1771494,0.02536131,0.03030648,0.005058071,0.0003645643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8718656,0.0004549182,0.1104446,0.002053083,0.0001009761,0.001374327,0.0003644623,0.000120029,0.01322203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838827,0.00009884089,0.01486436,0.0001720218,0.00003492092,0.0005349115,0.0001102483,0.00001379361,0.0002881273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1777406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9399933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00819061618418466,"score_gpt":0.2431691402726314,"score_spread":0.2349785240884468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}