{"id":"W2131938224","doi":"10.1037/a0034006","title":"Common dyadic coping is indirectly related to dietary and exercise adherence via patient and partner diabetes efficacy.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; National Center for Research Resources; Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance","keywords":"Spouse; Coping (psychology); Diabetes mellitus; Structural equation modeling; Psychology; Type 2 diabetes; Clinical psychology; Mediation; Social support; Self-efficacy; Medicine; Psychotherapist; Endocrinology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002500406,0.0002407406,0.0004336057,0.0007710107,0.0006805845,0.0008194318,0.000274574,0.0003052118,0.002265607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123866,0.0002454818,0.0005404534,0.0008155704,0.0003626511,0.0004234338,0.001118865,0.0007547627,0.00008962437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002767509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003779637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002454189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004506039,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981217,0.001208905,0.0001565818,0.0001625553,0.0002003098,0.0001499533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992204,0.003399682,0.002851283,0.0005925078,0.0002802198,0.0006724182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003495615,0.00006530338,0.9950374,0.00001374378,0.0001150062,0.00005173195,0.0006829034,0.00003426481,0.00009026067,0.00004412673,0.0000321427,0.003798212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004531587,0.0001253506,0.9977739,0.00001259204,0.00007017752,0.0002638841,0.001230923,0.000246978,0.00005101634,0.00009757094,0.0001177293,0.000005193003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989574,0.0002396842,0.0002308758,0.00005945316,0.000004582499,0.000009729092,0.00007887291,0.000001502742,0.0004180366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996293,0.00008699923,0.0001320863,0.0000188122,0.000003150046,0.000009306799,0.00005874633,4.790837e-7,0.00006128883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002500406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01322353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0366234447144683,"score_gpt":0.3835626677129642,"score_spread":0.3469392229984959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}