{"id":"W2131994285","doi":"10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.027","title":"Effectiveness of self-adhesive luting cements in bonding to chlorhexidine-treated dentin","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dental Materials","topic":"Dental materials and restorations","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Dentin; Materials science; Chlorhexidine; Molar; Bond strength; Adhesive; Dentistry; Dental cement; Universal testing machine; Dental bonding; Crown (dentistry); Cement; Composite material; Nuclear chemistry; Ultimate tensile strength; Medicine; Chemistry; Layer (electronics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002368906,0.0008611316,0.0007246031,0.0006851671,0.0006797788,0.0007225588,0.0006879646,0.0008915293,0.002084165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003116027,0.0007652412,0.000778653,0.0004766865,0.0009336073,0.0007774471,0.0005072999,0.000807502,0.0002397522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004036003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001291845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003112352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005815396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986132,0.0005992558,0.00014923,0.0001519562,0.0003285815,0.000157641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961713,0.002229805,0.0003922668,0.0002535541,0.0004854107,0.0004676362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0304207,0.002089087,0.01165118,0.001608612,0.000454593,0.0003575412,0.002228502,0.0006624147,0.8846236,0.0008303452,0.000485935,0.06458744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007332318,0.02653985,0.05332348,0.0001591588,0.001634513,0.000629405,0.001105302,0.00207232,0.9099527,0.0002249383,0.003537147,0.00008806518],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992768,0.005529589,0.0003311925,0.00004762298,0.00006166752,0.00003842155,0.00006214016,0.00002577138,0.001135513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942597,0.002682045,0.001577332,0.00005021336,0.00006367861,0.00002807601,0.0001104528,0.00002444292,0.001204044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003112352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01252818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02203366011692346,"score_gpt":0.2738020850488456,"score_spread":0.2517684249319221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}