{"id":"W2132008944","doi":"10.1139/z05-034","title":"Population dynamics of the endangered mountain ecotype of woodland caribou (<i>Rangifer tarandus caribou</i>) in British Columbia, Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Ministry of Environment; University of British Columbia","funders":"International Council for Canadian Studies; Parks Canada","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Vital rates; Endangered species; Ecology; Population; Biology; Population decline; Fragmentation (computing); Ecotype; Mark and recapture; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Population growth; Predation; Demography; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002425253,0.00005117077,0.0002059735,0.00003949825,0.00007136686,0.000009274109,0.000209813,0.0001158129,0.0006344615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001103905,0.00006444872,0.0000412017,0.000178183,0.0001596397,0.00009351345,0.00001518702,0.0001854872,7.466868e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009202575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000780492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991066,0.0001128581,0.000387064,0.00008350195,0.0001085671,0.0002014167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994258,0.00005255459,0.000270771,0.0001049665,0.00003356341,0.0001123692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007006692,0.000008370939,0.9937408,0.000002901931,0.00001007402,0.00002521498,0.000105551,0.002104614,0.00001010484,0.00001240287,0.001673486,0.002299499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003712625,0.00004079579,0.9981721,0.00001538611,0.00001711279,0.0001169087,0.0001030994,0.0004060853,0.000006055652,0.0002327,0.0004620001,0.00005650531],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976985,0.0001080335,0.000009245117,0.001466915,0.000365075,0.00008594456,0.000095374,6.172227e-7,0.0001702866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992269,0.000005190738,0.00007245245,0.0004778436,0.00003713089,0.000001214121,0.00001474379,0.000005331027,0.0001592144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004431316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6946909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003820703572434728,"score_gpt":0.1654955498181066,"score_spread":0.1616748462456719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}