{"id":"W2132048472","doi":"10.5539/ibr.v6n7p32","title":"Accounting Conservatism and Information Asymmetry: Evidence from Taiwan","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Earnings; Information asymmetry; Accounting; Corporation; Empirical evidence; Economics; Neutrality; Empirical research; Earnings response coefficient; Business; Financial economics; Political science; Finance; Law; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009715934,0.0001794133,0.0001632231,0.0006889551,0.0003152822,0.002656973,0.0007543926,0.00007796351,0.001934787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02775592,0.0001773453,0.00002972282,0.001161885,0.0001800995,0.01627401,0.001176526,0.0003827118,0.0037865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001138372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004709097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02220633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973473,0.00002618332,0.0003955046,0.0003486598,0.001469122,0.0004132268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939481,0.0003603784,0.002606842,0.0002655208,0.0027967,0.00002247612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004615404,0.00004404713,0.6767267,0.0002028448,0.00008066413,0.00001255226,0.0001552399,0.00009977364,0.001533204,0.01256608,0.04683058,0.2617022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002871561,0.000002567259,0.7752153,0.0002928706,0.000006292894,0.000001177471,0.0001900245,0.004540953,0.00002784894,0.004117011,0.2151442,0.0001746245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9009278,0.0001517346,0.04001502,0.02992049,0.0008041657,0.0006306193,0.00001182359,0.0001715636,0.02736677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948918,0.0001078951,0.0006800745,0.002195045,0.0012335,0.0001133215,0.00009571725,0.00002399762,0.0006586718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2615276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03431877589879723,"score_gpt":0.2947887523823109,"score_spread":0.2604699764835137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}