{"id":"W2132068163","doi":"10.1007/s10980-009-9383-3","title":"Confronting collinearity: comparing methods for disentangling the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landscape Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":351,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Collinearity; Landscape ecology; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat fragmentation; Ecology; Nature Conservation; Geography; Habitat; Sustainable development; Habitat destruction; Biology; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003266159,0.00006450395,0.0001650352,0.00001546226,0.0002146881,0.000006969785,0.00006495574,0.00004774375,0.00001710633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001869682,0.00004851072,0.00002569563,0.00005408013,0.0001254564,0.00004681195,0.00004890821,0.00005738592,0.000002361778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002821487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003445533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005060538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999456,0.00009330761,0.0001455063,0.000134022,0.00003151839,0.0001395748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986534,0.001162115,0.00009582176,0.00006090432,0.00000911897,0.00001865389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002247364,0.0000312701,0.9933218,0.00002172063,0.00002073015,7.656681e-7,0.0006691011,0.0005529362,0.0007387884,0.001181259,0.0001298499,0.003309282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006854121,0.0001969039,0.9138921,0.000005203477,0.00004479446,0.000003465253,0.0001852317,0.07928719,0.0003907767,0.005128092,0.0001189468,0.00006181363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98655,0.0002164289,0.01130892,0.0006096018,0.0002212122,0.0003301388,8.508948e-7,0.00001178208,0.0007510136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852955,0.00003816611,0.01427197,0.0002568985,0.00001942158,0.00002951214,0.000004933991,0.000003177552,0.00008045093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07942966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.197821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007330592101495395,"score_gpt":0.2896623369024088,"score_spread":0.2823317448009134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}