{"id":"W2132180230","doi":"10.7202/1005671ar","title":"Tacit Knowledge: Revisiting the epistemology of knowledge","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l éducation de McGill","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Explicit knowledge; Procedural knowledge; Organizational learning; Knowledge value chain; Body of knowledge; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02243409,0.001179461,0.001692258,0.009760602,0.005282632,0.01891492,0.004510645,0.005972113,0.003070403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02504647,0.0006140794,0.001594075,0.006665555,0.09639513,0.03967981,0.007796492,0.009938839,0.0009641364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01083249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01142883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009752641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00653614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9810931,0.01103547,0.001027671,0.001894439,0.003899564,0.001049767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9519457,0.03680522,0.001911747,0.004127769,0.004032333,0.001177354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004953616,0.000006805697,0.0001147243,0.0001262587,0.000005996848,0.00007171052,0.007094922,0.0002333175,0.00003204271,0.9862315,0.0006214199,0.005456266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005841521,0.000008280998,0.0001454344,0.0004672542,0.000005553463,0.00008986989,0.002719112,0.0006919107,0.00009098234,0.9661239,0.02963814,0.00001372092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03332952,0.08082204,0.3391281,0.1351527,0.004632523,0.0001711349,0.0002754938,0.0002403983,0.4062481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8749102,0.03692668,0.05887897,0.009685412,0.003839004,0.0003679154,0.0002065676,0.0002114253,0.01497377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02243409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1186442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4689657560675015,"score_gpt":0.5033838591899166,"score_spread":0.03441810312241506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}