{"id":"W2132203208","doi":"10.1190/1.2210847","title":"Comparison of integral equation and physical scale modeling of the electromagnetic responses of models with large conductivity contrasts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysics","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Electric-field integral equation; Integral equation; Mathematical analysis; Basis function; Electric field; Electromagnetic field; Computational electromagnetics; Physics; Geometry; Mathematics; Computational physics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001471472,0.0001121701,0.0003702665,0.00002735143,0.00005525178,0.000006354665,0.0001147427,0.00003675399,0.000006018425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002521823,0.00006787779,0.000069362,0.000344054,0.0001761547,0.0001201316,0.00001385987,0.000143051,6.784659e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001798835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004182175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002241747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003101212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989536,0.0001769708,0.0002253601,0.0001608867,0.000280144,0.0002030711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992145,0.0003228482,0.0001714883,0.0001485767,0.0001111049,0.00003147496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002644693,0.002557134,0.238639,0.0004229897,0.0001302346,0.00000112353,0.003092744,0.4231018,0.1645134,0.03428135,0.00002353383,0.130592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002873898,0.0006086045,0.1646565,0.00002041364,0.00004141766,5.436852e-7,0.00006604788,0.7346454,0.02168525,0.07791098,7.700184e-7,0.00007664429],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884634,0.0001142856,0.01082073,0.00003420629,0.00002074089,0.0001399647,0.00005005074,0.000006918749,0.0003497181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984159,0.000001727115,0.00149792,0.000006685764,0.00003801175,9.050828e-7,0.000009832727,0.00000271525,0.00002632787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3115436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3388866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02980896260215827,"score_gpt":0.2636399159080168,"score_spread":0.2338309533058586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}