{"id":"W2132222182","doi":"10.1080/10255842.2011.617006","title":"Development of an image-based technique to examine joint congruency at the elbow","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering","topic":"Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Elbow; Joint (building); Cadaveric spasm; Computer science; Osteoarthritis; Orthodontics; Biomechanics; Contact mechanics; Contact area; Materials science; Engineering; Anatomy; Medicine; Structural engineering; Finite element method","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001149149,0.0003701231,0.0002938949,0.001301556,0.000213154,0.0006610813,0.0006560683,0.0007347756,0.001566493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003071282,0.000374209,0.0002402923,0.0006133752,0.0004289003,0.0008438572,0.0006478457,0.0007635702,0.0005572416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001857498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005078752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000597899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001142483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995029,0.0001237638,0.00002790565,0.00007056411,0.000255038,0.0000199002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998924,0.0004741961,0.0001234219,0.0001573344,0.0002833261,0.00003783696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001795409,0.00009456035,0.003224566,0.0002643807,0.00003493269,0.0001848172,0.0001953606,0.004296745,0.7241806,0.00206861,0.0004464471,0.2648294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001080412,0.001549251,0.04037088,0.0001159916,0.0001591089,0.00780554,0.0003197843,0.1947798,0.7377759,0.002539926,0.01430648,0.0001693836],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02951451,0.0003378578,0.9686043,0.00007589997,0.00003043584,0.0001421445,0.00006492613,0.0003655535,0.0008644896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1375127,0.0003932184,0.8608152,0.00004705609,0.0000278922,0.0002105881,0.00006302411,0.00006536069,0.0008650071],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001566493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006077349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03238698178389856,"score_gpt":0.3414115750116606,"score_spread":0.3090245932277621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}