{"id":"W2132360826","doi":"10.1111/2041-210x.12106","title":"Calibrating indices of avian density from non‐standardized survey data: making the most of a messy situation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Breeding bird survey; Sampling (signal processing); Covariate; Songbird; Range (aeronautics); Statistics; Survey data collection; RADIUS; Count data; Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Mathematics; Habitat; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002761524,0.00007227415,0.0002080706,0.00003327311,0.0001306355,0.000005193848,0.0001955396,0.0001637185,0.0003542999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005977796,0.00005570713,0.00001334321,0.0001844656,0.0004254965,0.0003011925,0.0002919892,0.0001491665,0.000006585359],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005978586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001988196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00301739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01713329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980022,0.001278667,0.0002873713,0.0002189288,0.00007365811,0.0001391532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985983,0.0009040705,0.0002360982,0.0002294528,0.00001465253,0.00001741589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000271875,0.00003847571,0.9849294,0.000003426483,0.000007790278,4.40186e-7,0.0005339134,0.00008759901,0.008628572,0.000005920109,0.00006227208,0.005674967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002489567,0.00003851813,0.9908577,0.000007550403,0.00002576021,0.000001548044,0.0002900411,0.005288514,0.001295937,0.001888098,0.000002960784,0.00005447662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488807,0.00003151942,0.05055074,0.00006503162,0.0001235284,0.0002181348,0.0000296331,0.000004724568,0.0000959899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9267462,0.000006004347,0.07314089,0.00004051929,0.000008498198,0.00001218831,0.00003069873,0.000003258203,0.00001173595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02259015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9560781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04222651582612921,"score_gpt":0.3494875924357468,"score_spread":0.3072610766096177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}