{"id":"W2132380992","doi":"10.1046/j.1467-2960.2001.00056.x","title":"Compensatory density dependence in fish populations: importance, controversy, understanding and prognosis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fish and Fisheries","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":695,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Density dependence; Population; Compensation (psychology); Offset (computer science); Population dynamics of fisheries; Population growth; Field (mathematics); Reproduction; Econometrics; Ecology; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Computer science; Fishery; Economics; Demography; Mathematics; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001948121,0.0001311924,0.0001816657,0.00003998555,0.0002159856,0.0001264614,0.00009752926,0.00008174896,0.001768392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008496326,0.0001306731,0.00002142062,0.0002165791,0.0003783387,0.0005564929,0.0002275906,0.000171051,0.000003623082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001153025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009591084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001158383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04176144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989026,0.00004110791,0.0001969741,0.0003202773,0.0002257665,0.0003132726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996229,0.00006165035,0.00004828783,0.0001358464,0.000007664721,0.0001236387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004853907,0.00002406311,0.9905125,0.00001102705,0.000004247791,0.00004665362,0.0001882309,7.762299e-7,0.00001716207,0.0003661021,0.005703298,0.00307734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004166332,0.00005726601,0.9561777,0.000007466008,0.000005156624,0.00003133672,0.0007747592,0.0003655695,0.000008315354,0.002433155,0.03955242,0.0001702825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9124147,0.00001341084,0.0001129052,0.00224792,0.0000480491,0.0002573804,0.00000998896,0.00003344724,0.08486223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975241,0.0003635723,0.0002704151,0.001108897,0.0000227982,0.00002313518,0.00001439503,0.000009984955,0.0006626688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08510946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04897646224482216,"score_gpt":0.2529650833701494,"score_spread":0.2039886211253272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}