{"id":"W2132462735","doi":"10.1109/tmag.2006.880998","title":"A Note on &amp;#8220;Signal-to-Noise Ratio Mismatch for Low-Density Parity-Check Coded Magnetic Recording Channels&amp;#8221; by W. Tan and J. R. Cruz","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Magnetics","topic":"Error Correcting Code Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Low-density parity-check code; Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging); Gaussian; Channel (broadcasting); Physics; Algorithm; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Telecommunications; Decoding methods; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005111618,0.0005136496,0.0004709062,0.0003890004,0.0005798246,0.0004031965,0.0006785868,0.0002909427,0.00004238866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004409886,0.0005786607,0.0001830797,0.000694963,0.0001088011,0.0002439219,0.00001605172,0.0005704775,0.00007636996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001756728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008034091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005479897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001242775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969687,0.0001761138,0.0006128787,0.001043534,0.0004959476,0.0007027943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976346,0.0006454981,0.0001663173,0.001012424,0.000271238,0.0002699277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008516869,0.002921837,0.000137358,0.0005023224,0.00007665738,0.00002947291,0.004483662,0.02462105,0.5988376,0.001300657,0.1023516,0.263886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003767838,0.0062839,0.000412655,0.0007094754,0.0003147106,0.000161905,0.00008550299,0.1793277,0.7390792,0.0122168,0.05410514,0.003535129],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07049447,0.00007773953,0.923638,0.00230182,0.001105868,0.001218159,0.00006857244,0.0008438744,0.0002514659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7505931,0.00005813917,0.2420516,0.0008634456,0.0001330013,0.0002390303,0.00001329827,0.00008026089,0.005968102],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6815864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01921664586638091,"score_gpt":0.2614097044063069,"score_spread":0.242193058539926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}