{"id":"W2132536848","doi":"10.1109/tasl.2006.885246","title":"Statistical Analysis of Doubletalk Detection for Calibration and Performance Evaluation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing","topic":"Speech and Audio Processing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Detector; Detection theory; Calibration; Probability density function; Estimator; Detection threshold; Computer science; Statistical power; SIGNAL (programming language); Algorithm; Statistical model; Variable (mathematics); Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Real-time computing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003846772,0.0008290878,0.0004923428,0.0009822147,0.0003086313,0.0007045853,0.0009881661,0.0007886814,0.001963037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0181866,0.0003289187,0.0005366699,0.001138698,0.0005253975,0.001205914,0.0007044641,0.001004662,0.0005480901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007636739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000862263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00100329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008584747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974478,0.00063958,0.0001201718,0.0003763142,0.001276732,0.0001393369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890132,0.007093886,0.0007000056,0.001621939,0.001483892,0.00008713363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005259225,0.0002592635,0.01061,0.0002432308,0.0001999553,0.0003529715,0.0002076541,0.7129348,0.07846658,0.03558052,0.001477033,0.159142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000815354,0.0001396492,0.003396182,0.000009948153,0.0000183559,0.0002177296,0.00001876186,0.9624448,0.02885906,0.004061111,0.000794282,0.00003204053],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03917499,0.00006968524,0.9593617,0.00004564202,0.00001408184,0.0000335761,0.00009452449,0.0005801512,0.0006255239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8048732,0.0001585988,0.1928734,0.00009665037,0.00002728224,0.0001756225,0.0005767007,0.0002570416,0.0009615177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003846772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0203439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0154997010519663,"score_gpt":0.2892176610749596,"score_spread":0.2737179600229933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}