{"id":"W2132548767","doi":"10.11137/2006_1_153-162","title":"Comparison of CART and discriminant analysis of morphometric data in foraminiferal taxonomy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anuário do Instituto de Geociências","topic":"Morphological variations and asymmetry","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Indian Institute of Technology Bombay","keywords":"Linear discriminant analysis; Discriminant; Statistics; Data set; Whorl (mollusc); Mathematics; Pattern recognition (psychology); Multivariate statistics; Cart; Artificial intelligence; Set (abstract data type); Test set; Regression; Tree (set theory); Computer science; Biology; Genus; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006102677,0.0001477554,0.0007338588,0.000823222,0.000048457,0.00002443135,0.000326514,0.0001150874,0.0000683274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000439314,0.0001253404,0.0000919132,0.002068567,0.0001297369,0.0001604823,0.0002376941,0.0001349665,0.000001291173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004627943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006858225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003532496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002672589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984406,0.00005917714,0.0007312532,0.0003028307,0.0002241539,0.0002420199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985727,0.0003486538,0.0003310664,0.0006331145,0.00006598949,0.00004847083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001400687,0.0006883704,0.9026353,0.00008577501,0.0001606579,0.00001390301,0.0001465169,0.0003191542,0.0002642112,0.09166438,0.001339583,0.002668134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005847145,0.00008347035,0.9783778,0.00004074418,0.000829004,0.000004026856,0.0005684205,0.01123683,0.0005258977,0.004099581,0.003445511,0.0002039826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789302,0.0003582662,0.01655779,0.00002646103,0.00003695656,0.0002317255,0.0002235778,0.00001364418,0.003621392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695866,0.00001590126,0.03013142,0.00001328969,0.00002588072,0.00001553468,0.0001481674,0.000006600831,0.00005664348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0875648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5340101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1531725697520871,"score_gpt":0.3699112187391137,"score_spread":0.2167386489870266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}