{"id":"W2132548767","doi":"10.11137/2006_1_153-162","title":"Comparison of CART and discriminant analysis of morphometric data in foraminiferal taxonomy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anuário do Instituto de Geociências","topic":"Morphological variations and asymmetry","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Indian Institute of Technology Bombay","keywords":"Linear discriminant analysis; Discriminant; Statistics; Data set; Whorl (mollusc); Mathematics; Pattern recognition (psychology); Multivariate statistics; Cart; Artificial intelligence; Set (abstract data type); Test set; Regression; Tree (set theory); Computer science; Biology; Genus; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008630031,0.00085324,0.0006611765,0.007422471,0.0004365096,0.00161268,0.000456711,0.0005706371,0.001444283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0156857,0.0003717536,0.0007563513,0.00527716,0.0006153379,0.001015854,0.0008113343,0.000547775,0.0007127153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007318186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006338427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006779142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005399216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961084,0.002077093,0.00017094,0.0002910087,0.001122668,0.0002299008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988654,0.007812811,0.0005340495,0.0005148213,0.002161163,0.0003232369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002122349,0.0001935665,0.08882736,0.0006079061,0.0005078276,0.0002243603,0.00114862,0.07420199,0.006593888,0.00678125,0.003168283,0.8156226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001256982,0.000684972,0.2009314,0.0002429975,0.0003045391,0.0004445309,0.001344022,0.7713719,0.005597489,0.008168557,0.01058738,0.0001964655],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8009635,0.004338041,0.1795733,0.0007219912,0.000232368,0.0003214257,0.001709138,0.00123832,0.01090185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8805544,0.001041198,0.1151469,0.00008037266,0.00008750109,0.0001587837,0.001161113,0.0001207198,0.001648878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008630031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04564053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1531725697520871,"score_gpt":0.3699112187391137,"score_spread":0.2167386489870266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}