{"id":"W2132631369","doi":"10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28[307:caifes]2.0.co;2","title":"Criteria and Indicators for Evaluating Social Equity and Ecological Integrity in National Parks and Protected Areas","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Areas Journal","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Disadvantaged; Equity (law); Environmental resource management; Geography; National park; Environmental planning; Protected area; Environmental protection; Political science; Ecology; Economic growth; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03488288,0.0005979679,0.0007592139,0.01713468,0.002447538,0.003117779,0.001322005,0.001014574,0.002101267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07476394,0.0002139055,0.0007293918,0.0108407,0.003878177,0.005551654,0.004662625,0.001446576,0.0001961142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003303276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003575867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005458915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01083643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9738446,0.009668205,0.005271949,0.0006893245,0.009280255,0.001245737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8916607,0.0494729,0.0211828,0.003534968,0.02968916,0.00445937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000365713,0.0003392465,0.7508853,0.0008801555,0.0002602701,0.0002956572,0.01001,0.006595708,0.00115634,0.05794772,0.005040789,0.1662232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006905009,0.001185948,0.7843154,0.001728531,0.0002763469,0.0008967183,0.06284186,0.02005572,0.004583207,0.07572603,0.04800985,0.0003112692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7393005,0.003636069,0.1262271,0.004308316,0.0002868277,0.002753076,0.004246174,0.0002444933,0.1189973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401853,0.0004120524,0.0559709,0.0001353464,0.00007822691,0.0009773638,0.001385881,0.00001869939,0.0008362415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03488288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1844805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06837674676054706,"score_gpt":0.3326972932368612,"score_spread":0.2643205464763141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}