{"id":"W2132631369","doi":"10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28[307:caifes]2.0.co;2","title":"Criteria and Indicators for Evaluating Social Equity and Ecological Integrity in National Parks and Protected Areas","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Areas Journal","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Disadvantaged; Equity (law); Environmental resource management; Geography; National park; Environmental planning; Protected area; Environmental protection; Political science; Ecology; Economic growth; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007894884,0.00008797219,0.0001083761,0.00007531809,0.000713395,0.00006641729,0.00008414024,0.00008185518,0.0001385679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003203128,0.00006722904,0.00002409638,0.0001193969,0.0002589047,0.0001448802,0.000385289,0.0003357908,8.379608e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001581704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002033511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005100747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009190674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990825,0.00009317073,0.0001539893,0.0001767484,0.0003300681,0.0001635356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997061,0.00007330973,0.00009247853,0.00002134265,0.0000294864,0.00007725763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009765259,0.00004012593,0.9767618,0.00001007943,0.00001096712,0.000008561255,0.0009466064,0.000002226777,0.0003631208,0.00001350813,0.0005325447,0.02121279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008024931,0.00007142042,0.9945944,0.000008330967,0.000009332801,0.00009938427,0.0002072925,0.001740004,0.00001150615,0.001898988,0.0004647481,0.0000921129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975112,0.00008504686,0.00002045055,0.001770929,0.00005113794,0.0002571589,0.000006603593,0.000008217073,0.0002892538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985725,0.00003374388,0.000986196,0.000291963,0.0000581143,0.000007050969,0.000004539984,0.000002209122,0.00004364763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02112068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5486929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06837674676054706,"score_gpt":0.3326972932368612,"score_spread":0.2643205464763141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}