{"id":"W2132668231","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.025","title":"Neighborhood Walkability and the Walking Behavior of Australian Adults","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":626,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Community College; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Walkability; Recreation; Socioeconomic status; Built environment; Social connectedness; Environmental health; Level design; Geography; Community design; Gerontology; Transport engineering; Psychology; Medicine; Population; Computer science; Social psychology; Ecology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00502743,0.00008987685,0.0004345726,0.00007332781,0.0001276227,0.000006191094,0.000264977,0.00002548982,0.0001884592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000492251,0.0000504753,0.0001137542,0.0003677577,0.004514012,0.0001532596,0.00001506663,0.0002303482,2.475127e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004143003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007719682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002787325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009473278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982153,0.0003218474,0.0006485613,0.0001167528,0.000490237,0.0002073482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998033,0.0005203689,0.000860878,0.000123441,0.0003091228,0.0001531219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005530139,0.0001120261,0.7938446,0.00001330433,0.00004551267,0.00001352794,0.02634933,6.210666e-8,0.0001452702,0.0006016706,0.00004877612,0.1782729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001696018,0.0004619128,0.9615757,0.0001530996,0.0002087474,0.000004942987,0.03332022,3.860887e-7,0.0001900715,0.001693845,0.0006328983,0.00006213321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942216,0.0002673311,0.0005866289,0.003046334,0.0001952826,0.0002079325,0.000001860019,0.000004360355,0.001468634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991937,0.00006903163,0.0002163448,0.00006812878,0.0003088891,0.000001206398,4.588394e-7,0.000004317246,0.0001379678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1782108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01248913905533173,"score_gpt":0.3271522459770581,"score_spread":0.3146631069217264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}