{"id":"W2132668231","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.025","title":"Neighborhood Walkability and the Walking Behavior of Australian Adults","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":626,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Community College; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Walkability; Recreation; Socioeconomic status; Built environment; Social connectedness; Environmental health; Level design; Geography; Community design; Gerontology; Transport engineering; Psychology; Medicine; Population; Computer science; Social psychology; Ecology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005333036,0.0002000802,0.0003229266,0.0005829928,0.0006802904,0.00072195,0.0003519714,0.000759084,0.001551385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002653943,0.0003234408,0.0005878726,0.0009140426,0.000266008,0.0005650182,0.0005046983,0.001043945,0.0001981438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000510094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004534949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1155506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1636801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996841,0.00008657221,0.00004542334,0.00004963314,0.00007064579,0.00006368221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988764,0.000111798,0.0004186187,0.00005419051,0.0001771315,0.0003617881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007444107,0.000126581,0.9969919,0.000016508,0.00006884929,0.00006647986,0.0008982943,0.00003759091,0.0001407035,0.00003555005,0.00007368538,0.001469386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.643153e-7,0.00005893713,0.9993091,0.000004752809,0.00001116643,0.00003009017,0.0004131841,0.00007826091,0.000007458637,0.00001444957,0.0000696658,0.000002095074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991404,0.0001406334,0.00001477527,0.00007245914,0.000004668693,0.000004705602,0.00007836988,6.733527e-7,0.0005433423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994234,0.0001237609,0.00003999708,0.00002483326,0.000004788579,0.000004215621,0.00006908471,7.074054e-7,0.0003091809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1155506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.229756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01248913905533173,"score_gpt":0.3271522459770581,"score_spread":0.3146631069217264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}