{"id":"W2132827486","doi":"","title":"An empirical perspective on uncertainty in earthquake ground motion prediction1This paper is one of a selection of papers in this Special Issue in honour of Professor Davenport.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Seismic hazard; Ground motion; Honour; Seismology; Strong ground motion; Attenuation; Hazard; Tectonics; Geology; Uncertainty quantification; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Geography; Physics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003708255,0.000129296,0.0003802421,0.001241044,0.00001280427,0.000004303094,0.0001125948,0.000115778,0.001637194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005780506,0.0001418248,0.00008438974,0.0007141099,0.00002720137,0.0002685978,0.000002896437,0.0004162021,6.853178e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005340503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001904236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007869964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1639355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988645,0.00002921218,0.0006007258,0.00010561,0.0001751322,0.0002247688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995189,0.00002108132,0.0001292054,0.00009761506,0.0001039386,0.0001292925],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009638092,0.0001594437,0.07235408,0.0001941145,0.0001537643,0.00004425215,0.03182284,0.8864319,0.005361824,0.00008290514,0.0002113561,0.003087135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001358723,0.0005461344,0.791721,0.001146258,0.00006458846,0.00002833895,0.004736443,0.193673,0.005680148,0.0001057831,0.0006252899,0.0003142049],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966085,0.00009723281,0.0001499172,0.00004907339,0.0002129884,0.00008306713,0.00001063662,0.000006133045,0.002782479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995355,0.00007307881,0.00008779437,0.00001718749,0.000247601,0.000002954965,0.000001842632,0.00001827835,0.0000157524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.719367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01243082708966175,"score_gpt":0.2180425321660197,"score_spread":0.205611705076358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}