{"id":"W2132830415","doi":"10.1007/s10816-014-9202-2","title":"The Materialities of Place Making in the Ancient Andes: a Critical Appraisal of the Ontological Turn in Archaeological Interpretation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Ontology; Personhood; Epistemology; History; Meaning (existential); Archaeology; Aesthetics; Anthropology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01279481,0.0001243907,0.0004703667,0.00004964344,0.000356117,0.00001981852,0.000617292,0.0001574879,0.00008313152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01763167,0.00004390042,0.0001595207,0.0002128021,0.008248579,0.00007269408,0.0003144206,0.0004902026,1.73838e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002740371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003838324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009532884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000331811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900489,0.0083059,0.0007201472,0.000153597,0.0004388486,0.000332587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976676,0.02266898,0.0003679472,0.0001210393,0.0001166253,0.00004940757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008018154,0.0001166707,0.01025574,0.00001572375,0.00001244228,0.00000999359,0.03304599,0.00003220844,0.00007470517,0.9396681,0.000009539633,0.01595705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004439614,0.001034109,0.1735837,0.0001469049,0.00002296322,0.000049031,0.07816448,0.000257915,0.00006872725,0.7432531,0.002872996,0.0001020526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9443874,0.001506343,0.03784858,0.01154997,0.0005822832,0.0002036352,0.000002285506,0.00000523449,0.003914286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952286,0.0005272101,0.003733466,0.0003647963,0.0001293866,0.000006697713,6.968506e-8,0.00000240824,0.000007326707],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.196415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0351273762248026,"score_gpt":0.4019461220181789,"score_spread":0.3668187457933763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}