{"id":"W2132830415","doi":"10.1007/s10816-014-9202-2","title":"The Materialities of Place Making in the Ancient Andes: a Critical Appraisal of the Ontological Turn in Archaeological Interpretation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Ontology; Personhood; Epistemology; History; Meaning (existential); Archaeology; Aesthetics; Anthropology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02508566,0.001151725,0.001176633,0.009412888,0.01137677,0.01644797,0.003581373,0.004727281,0.003650604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0269473,0.0008522857,0.0005374165,0.008254834,0.1476695,0.02342699,0.007554402,0.008553594,0.0002223894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01226424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00905537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01196279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02512287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919517,0.005977776,0.0002740371,0.0004291138,0.0008224167,0.0005450408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9511877,0.04295734,0.001557554,0.00169116,0.002115702,0.0004905649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003709957,0.00001061277,0.0003138584,0.0003051956,0.00001041688,0.000203693,0.139453,0.0001912358,0.00009398511,0.8528765,0.0010459,0.005458645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002267415,0.00001974101,0.001782833,0.001804341,0.00003753732,0.0003289627,0.2777353,0.0004625951,0.000420048,0.6569586,0.06039381,0.00003367722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2658072,0.1034459,0.04960825,0.1863127,0.003351258,0.0003469324,0.0003551492,0.00009960505,0.3906729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814502,0.01020318,0.003157423,0.001563551,0.0005383116,0.0001092625,0.00003668848,0.00005554111,0.002885734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02508566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1326672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0351273762248026,"score_gpt":0.4019461220181789,"score_spread":0.3668187457933763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}