{"id":"W2132852309","doi":"10.1017/s2045381712000032","title":"Constitutionalism in an old key: Legality and constituent power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Principle of legality; Legal positivism; Positivism; Law; Ambivalence; Political science; Power (physics); Constitutional theory; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Epistemology; Legal research; Sociology; Legal realism; Constitutional law; Democracy; Philosophy; Politics; Psychology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00489664,0.0001936614,0.0003912695,0.00171335,0.003420218,0.005997577,0.0007642071,0.001494532,0.007077403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007984811,0.0001712047,0.0002660423,0.001482878,0.03983758,0.01109642,0.003767377,0.004016385,0.0004029599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003866771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001775607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001914607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002129186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969665,0.001684027,0.00009974951,0.0005457762,0.0004476312,0.0002563472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938736,0.004038628,0.0004120333,0.0008268992,0.0005896774,0.0002591061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001414525,0.000001197311,0.00003266761,0.00000394425,6.208204e-7,0.000006948713,0.0003282753,0.00002903925,0.00002154467,0.9988839,0.0001498726,0.000540659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004404686,0.000005593101,0.0001713551,0.00002851659,0.000002820731,0.00001869358,0.0004008066,0.0001427285,0.0001035798,0.9795296,0.01958882,0.000003099787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1132393,0.007336881,0.05054964,0.04260153,0.0004929988,0.00003489115,0.0000728285,0.000055264,0.7856166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990647,0.0006154716,0.001132729,0.0007218889,0.0001770564,0.00001396178,0.00001291557,0.00002002913,0.006658958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007077403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02805555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03748678777768234,"score_gpt":0.3369695124857261,"score_spread":0.2994827247080438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}