{"id":"W2132852309","doi":"10.1017/s2045381712000032","title":"Constitutionalism in an old key: Legality and constituent power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Principle of legality; Legal positivism; Positivism; Law; Ambivalence; Political science; Power (physics); Constitutional theory; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Epistemology; Legal research; Sociology; Legal realism; Constitutional law; Democracy; Philosophy; Politics; Psychology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001173514,0.0002579437,0.0003250816,0.00008704134,0.001335218,0.0001245214,0.0002331792,0.0002113807,0.0003118242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004465233,0.000262467,0.00008485473,0.0004804419,0.007366082,0.001295092,0.0001271482,0.000209717,0.0001276725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005724864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00119537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0142184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00638268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973646,0.0002891558,0.0004207122,0.0004041825,0.0007386131,0.0007827841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988788,0.0001175702,0.000101149,0.0001775875,0.0001970028,0.0005278671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002086222,0.0001611528,0.2436106,0.000002392474,0.00002238446,0.00001501228,0.0006718455,0.000005766691,0.000009521669,0.7547701,0.0005054722,0.0002049138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001118712,0.00002927938,0.3205347,0.00008560385,0.00005241204,0.0001037954,0.002409258,0.000003829689,0.000007818008,0.1438689,0.531117,0.0006686554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.450705,0.005948007,0.0007363046,0.005372511,0.002542963,0.0005882853,0.0004134706,0.0002036934,0.5334898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967999,0.0001588217,0.0004336737,0.001961781,0.0004885157,0.00004258645,0.00004102306,0.000003632507,0.0000700857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6109012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03748678777768234,"score_gpt":0.3369695124857261,"score_spread":0.2994827247080438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}