{"id":"W2132897157","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1070.0736","title":"Final-Offer Arbitration and Risk Aversion in Bargaining","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Arbitration; Bargaining problem; Outcome (game theory); Stipulation; Salary; Economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Microeconomics; Nash equilibrium; League; Wage bargaining; Workgroup; Mathematical economics; Wage; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Labour economics; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003265376,0.00006425942,0.0001458971,0.0004179436,0.0001964946,0.00010879,0.0001829702,0.0000306783,0.00003983763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004053616,0.00008956033,0.0000209004,0.0003787926,0.000178359,0.0004337952,0.00009987564,0.00006592938,0.0001674384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001413329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004669208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005950119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002208012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988891,0.000005434342,0.0003744805,0.0003988932,0.00004303308,0.0002890838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995613,0.00002132927,0.000178464,0.0001707317,0.00000740795,0.00006084069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000727712,0.00001905187,0.4644819,0.00000990767,0.000004913618,0.000004802291,0.0003733101,0.00009040163,0.00001057613,0.5315511,0.00007005828,0.0033767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005968543,0.00004119738,0.8666757,0.00002345014,0.000003431985,0.000001005637,0.0005043292,0.007850813,0.00007977904,0.1168968,0.007099786,0.0002267875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6525215,0.0001436254,0.007322758,0.00006070972,0.0003177146,0.0001680154,0.000002984467,0.00001494298,0.3394478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984105,0.0002945744,0.0006643735,0.0001976404,0.00004881782,0.000003817705,0.000001036308,0.000005078772,0.0003741531],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4146542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3652164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02901534520148268,"score_gpt":0.2203578720737928,"score_spread":0.1913425268723101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}