{"id":"W2132897157","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1070.0736","title":"Final-Offer Arbitration and Risk Aversion in Bargaining","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Arbitration; Bargaining problem; Outcome (game theory); Stipulation; Salary; Economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Microeconomics; Nash equilibrium; League; Wage bargaining; Workgroup; Mathematical economics; Wage; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Labour economics; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009269463,0.0009928335,0.001207523,0.0009821198,0.001807728,0.004644363,0.001677158,0.003056962,0.007470848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02835203,0.0006787783,0.001347265,0.001070165,0.007598322,0.005576085,0.00354854,0.004101216,0.0008028777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002258177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001383646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001801313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007993581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941239,0.003551719,0.0002101399,0.0006323821,0.000731217,0.0007506973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839057,0.01147177,0.002610461,0.0007780718,0.0006085002,0.0006255042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007546718,0.00006642207,0.0006555961,0.00004339679,0.0000300241,0.0001691943,0.0004323105,0.05430116,0.0004606413,0.9371805,0.0005196664,0.006065552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005612637,0.00004591306,0.0002944485,0.0000226712,0.0000190147,0.00006766879,0.0001504614,0.1103868,0.0002076002,0.8875061,0.00120736,0.00003580449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2071493,0.001171732,0.6985472,0.004619284,0.0002365863,0.0002082233,0.00009761938,0.0001879118,0.08778212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970084,0.0004351175,0.02001474,0.000200234,0.0001308601,0.000116359,0.00002246467,0.00002706004,0.008969199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009269463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0490222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02901534520148268,"score_gpt":0.2203578720737928,"score_spread":0.1913425268723101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}