{"id":"W2132909555","doi":"10.1109/aps.1994.408195","title":"An extended 2D FDTD method for hybrid mode analysis of lossy and superconducting structures","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Lossy compression; Planar; Mode (computer interface); Superconductivity; Variable (mathematics); Finite difference method; Computer science; Topology (electrical circuits); Optics; Physics; Mathematics; Condensed matter physics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001835898,0.0003151979,0.0002285753,0.0003028593,0.0002425561,0.0002798321,0.0004580133,0.0004358547,0.001385337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003679488,0.0001971254,0.0003387929,0.0002384169,0.0002292666,0.0004163834,0.0003411608,0.0003909483,0.0003246462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001806393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002969158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007507052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00114824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999176,0.00001979758,0.000003814961,0.000009675015,0.00004327589,0.000005785116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998877,0.00004381231,0.000008412187,0.00002158675,0.0000313433,0.000007017795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001090136,0.00007146413,0.001276914,0.0003297737,0.00005563244,0.0004746369,0.0003127016,0.4457881,0.1361038,0.07069165,0.005509876,0.3392764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008736939,0.0000259312,0.0001727997,0.00000856831,0.000005812546,0.0001692993,0.000009599348,0.9834779,0.003970958,0.003653824,0.008483972,0.00001249763],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.007369609,0.0001353724,0.9905816,0.00003734803,0.00008634313,0.00002038082,0.00003820409,0.0001890665,0.001542027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1216502,0.0002879714,0.8734555,0.00005116936,0.00003632744,0.0001273767,0.0001217189,0.0000868614,0.004182884],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001385337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00463438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02821440142739198,"score_gpt":0.3379391336764553,"score_spread":0.3097247322490633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}