{"id":"W2132912170","doi":"10.1353/scp.2005.0009","title":"A Tale of Two Journals: Comment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Value (mathematics); Reading (process); Product (mathematics); Circulation (fluid dynamics); Field (mathematics); Public relations; Apathy; Morality; Resistance (ecology); Marketing; Business; Psychology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Biology; Ecology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02115119,0.001049552,0.001258124,0.0022282,0.01193971,0.01598592,0.00899418,0.07020254,0.01471676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1165611,0.00123085,0.001782155,0.003334326,0.009642269,0.02318648,0.008409824,0.05641168,0.007009402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008674718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01257068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02348201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9840863,0.003288624,0.001640918,0.002938629,0.005969798,0.002075649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9116477,0.044649,0.004848187,0.004246221,0.02300867,0.01160032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000223406,0.00001502981,0.0003782792,0.00009036836,0.000007945605,0.0004531155,0.001046498,0.00001460916,0.0000912578,0.003239311,0.9929239,0.001717372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002460517,0.00002380525,0.0008156961,0.0003637241,0.00001183034,0.0008305339,0.005382342,0.00007732448,0.0002048202,0.002985473,0.9892038,0.00007617875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003082339,0.0007595934,0.00003779563,0.9754426,0.02206701,0.000005394716,0.00002652421,0.00001811881,0.001334673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002721396,0.0005424093,0.00008684849,0.9743357,0.01947729,0.00001366667,0.00002061291,0.00003718946,0.002764845],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1118595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07814171609244194,"score_gpt":0.2971661862438679,"score_spread":0.2190244701514259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}