{"id":"W2132959392","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.08.008","title":"Stress intensity factor for a cracked specimen under compression","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stress intensity factor; Compression (physics); Boundary (topology); Collocation (remote sensing); Stress (linguistics); Materials science; Intensity (physics); Structural engineering; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Composite material; Geology; Fracture mechanics; Engineering; Optics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001013098,0.0004273149,0.0003963482,0.0001394968,0.00008044508,0.00006003657,0.0002851905,0.0003341829,0.0001695849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005692053,0.0004071119,0.0001610599,0.0001515501,0.000005262285,0.0002360657,0.00004750896,0.0005389288,0.00004215853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001827916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001405244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002747393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001031853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985847,0.000008158589,0.0003238288,0.0003078103,0.0002427818,0.0005327513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991232,0.0001213635,0.00005223951,0.0004265094,0.00009223377,0.0001845066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002360917,0.00004173294,0.000002614205,0.0001470893,0.0001098728,0.000003788134,0.0003938944,0.960758,0.02644069,0.001922334,0.003357228,0.006799194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004412951,0.00004238412,0.0000720113,0.00008340498,0.00003197102,0.00000700546,0.00003744747,0.7459763,0.1310201,0.0004756166,0.1213548,0.0004577173],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01185436,0.0006957486,0.9838043,0.0003413709,0.001648747,0.0004498605,0.0001180467,0.001020055,0.0000674908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766238,0.00005775788,0.02166328,0.0004019035,0.0009047389,0.00003851521,0.0000791421,0.0001494392,0.0000813904],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01138807765105699,"score_gpt":0.2102509876471305,"score_spread":0.1988629099960736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}