{"id":"W2132959392","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.08.008","title":"Stress intensity factor for a cracked specimen under compression","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stress intensity factor; Compression (physics); Boundary (topology); Collocation (remote sensing); Stress (linguistics); Materials science; Intensity (physics); Structural engineering; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Composite material; Geology; Fracture mechanics; Engineering; Optics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005262538,0.0002767705,0.0003987523,0.0009043356,0.0003334548,0.0003333735,0.0004523687,0.000689864,0.009163174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001578405,0.0001651873,0.0002432718,0.0005843805,0.0005260908,0.0005160373,0.0002083091,0.0003748131,0.0007403278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003864841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003909526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002380605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001626695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998327,0.00001317547,0.00001034441,0.00003947193,0.00006902619,0.00003522065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985334,0.0006290177,0.000139455,0.00008046389,0.0004720312,0.0001455814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040258,0.0004517699,0.0127222,0.0003688299,0.00005393726,0.001159587,0.0004626441,0.01732439,0.9141178,0.006256032,0.001890467,0.04116653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003191297,0.003734938,0.349545,0.0001134362,0.0002560521,0.003270167,0.001375005,0.1432964,0.4887381,0.003250027,0.005851638,0.0002501679],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672916,0.0003460593,0.01786131,0.0001491049,0.000070631,0.00006928939,0.0004878698,0.0004257651,0.01329834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946872,0.0000830787,0.00268347,0.00002731013,0.00001748875,0.00001213972,0.0001877811,0.00003898071,0.00226264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009163174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03065383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01138807765105699,"score_gpt":0.2102509876471305,"score_spread":0.1988629099960736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}