{"id":"W2133031383","doi":"10.1109/iros.2011.6094874","title":"A computational approach for push recovery in case of multiple noncoplanar contacts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems","topic":"Robotic Locomotion and Control","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Stability (learning theory); A priori and a posteriori; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Humanoid robot; Control theory (sociology); State (computer science); Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Robot","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002352016,0.0001780455,0.000299532,0.0002213298,0.00003092449,0.00004343312,0.0001586028,0.00009949761,0.0001296101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002183111,0.0001633425,0.00007104682,0.00004217504,0.00003922077,0.0001176918,0.00001215212,0.0001160582,0.00001848683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006972156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003181152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005924915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008574846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988673,0.00003814149,0.0005250581,0.0002268738,0.0001672607,0.0001753794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993652,0.000111091,0.0001121204,0.0001215163,0.0002018896,0.00008821984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004070802,0.0004924726,0.004850343,0.0003736187,0.000414729,0.0001137022,0.002372928,0.8950075,0.0005892653,0.08569981,0.001512039,0.008166502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008418605,0.0001538147,0.0004463427,0.0001207072,0.00001093581,0.0001493909,0.0007137866,0.9964597,0.0003336768,0.0004899482,0.00009650315,0.0001833868],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06545901,0.0001717332,0.9101724,0.00003623674,0.00214092,0.001052225,0.0001399701,0.00006997871,0.02075753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969751,0.00007117326,0.002304309,0.00002841807,0.00007536255,0.0001360985,0.00005245837,0.00001880736,0.0003382605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9315161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6660913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0851985772062371,"score_gpt":0.2646175931648163,"score_spread":0.1794190159585792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}