{"id":"W2133183405","doi":"10.1111/j.1539-6975.2012.01473.x","title":"Designing a Countercyclical Insurance Program for Systemic Risk","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk & Insurance","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Solvency; Systemic risk; Construct (python library); Actuarial science; Capital requirement; Economics; Capital (architecture); Value at risk; Business; Financial crisis; Monetary economics; Risk management; Finance; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008309012,0.0002194652,0.000630135,0.0003083528,0.0003054608,0.0002581792,0.0007294572,0.0001537942,0.00001672889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005500329,0.0001493229,0.000399446,0.0007744173,0.00009852196,0.001410438,0.00002869525,0.0004672314,0.00005528961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009526235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001043749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002267313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005330605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956481,0.0005535202,0.001690718,0.0002492998,0.00136567,0.0004927186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926811,0.00214602,0.003147709,0.0004016643,0.001332119,0.0002913523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003198802,0.000175103,0.8173931,0.00000712692,0.000038596,0.000005283652,0.001037889,0.004733697,0.0001744651,0.00006691072,0.002940166,0.1731077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002012141,0.000460512,0.9221949,0.0002104266,0.00008325915,0.0008370704,0.0006212369,0.003078014,0.00061733,0.002184782,0.06735403,0.0003463104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8288869,0.004849362,0.1643558,0.00006666738,0.001198626,0.0004154237,0.00007001239,0.00003092847,0.0001262105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521224,0.004984399,0.04183227,0.00005620139,0.0008883465,0.00003102379,0.000001381341,0.00002538181,0.00005858552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1727614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6584805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05028341999256518,"score_gpt":0.3688228520638244,"score_spread":0.3185394320712592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}