{"id":"W2133183405","doi":"10.1111/j.1539-6975.2012.01473.x","title":"Designing a Countercyclical Insurance Program for Systemic Risk","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk & Insurance","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Solvency; Systemic risk; Construct (python library); Actuarial science; Capital requirement; Economics; Capital (architecture); Value at risk; Business; Financial crisis; Monetary economics; Risk management; Finance; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003340517,0.0004286634,0.0007096403,0.0007303683,0.0004838535,0.001409531,0.001224674,0.001105019,0.003301067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007223754,0.0002970347,0.000360127,0.0004817271,0.001093006,0.001434194,0.001863233,0.001380979,0.0002351578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001234213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001293153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001130683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006353763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983279,0.0006902336,0.00007279541,0.0003166681,0.0003579052,0.0002344658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963625,0.001387995,0.0008766763,0.0005795549,0.0003939611,0.0003992361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003638526,0.0005935056,0.006068245,0.00009775529,0.00009785686,0.0003993997,0.0002825743,0.6776525,0.01932641,0.1967561,0.002101499,0.09626019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006707938,0.0002824075,0.001047501,0.0000162364,0.00002175772,0.00006960234,0.00004856919,0.9690823,0.002515464,0.02527293,0.001556197,0.00001989557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3216512,0.0001715071,0.6666586,0.0009838669,0.00006794896,0.0003465117,0.00005552818,0.0006744529,0.009390331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669775,0.00003504472,0.03150708,0.0000529282,0.00002101267,0.00009224234,0.00001143582,0.0000235655,0.001279189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003340517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01766652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05028341999256518,"score_gpt":0.3688228520638244,"score_spread":0.3185394320712592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}