{"id":"W2133208151","doi":"10.2166/wh.2011.097","title":"Defensive spending on tap water substitutes: the value of reducing perceived health risks","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water and Health","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Ontario; Brock University","funders":"Brock University; University of Alberta; Canadian Water Network; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Tap water; Willingness to pay; Consumption (sociology); Health spending; Value (mathematics); Environmental health; Agricultural economics; Business; Socioeconomics; Demographic economics; Economics; Health services; Medicine; Statistics; Environmental engineering; Population; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007414215,0.0003004731,0.0002940931,0.0006565909,0.0003963135,0.001371017,0.0004792586,0.0007709222,0.002689363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005523308,0.0001667235,0.0004916274,0.0009877341,0.001015953,0.000631458,0.000465648,0.0006497242,0.0001504698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005150753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003222405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3677947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4528758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996032,0.0001185783,0.00001342178,0.00003206397,0.00008761987,0.0001451239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961531,0.001584565,0.001279077,0.000174056,0.0003550133,0.0004541932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003739216,0.0002869525,0.9390717,0.0001135506,0.0002726859,0.0003686265,0.001161412,0.02071785,0.001013946,0.00739226,0.00110266,0.02812438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002679371,0.0001546069,0.9582798,0.0000721514,0.000164308,0.0001605225,0.0021932,0.03121949,0.0003350966,0.004850053,0.002508792,0.0000350867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921921,0.0003180063,0.0009615154,0.0009921058,0.000003844402,0.00001967725,0.0003961178,0.000006465037,0.00511016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992412,0.0001317267,0.0001697388,0.00002326228,0.000002949772,0.000002413347,0.00009762779,9.336298e-7,0.0003300401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3677947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7313077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3087384389315391,"score_gpt":0.2960836899246891,"score_spread":0.01265474900685004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}