{"id":"W2133264519","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-005x.2010.00250.x","title":"Women, work and Web 2.0: a case study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Technology Work and Employment","topic":"Gender and Technology in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Work (physics); Set (abstract data type); Job satisfaction; Psychology; Knowledge management; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003769969,0.0001308777,0.0001623535,0.0002604348,0.0006077944,0.00004996041,0.0001773633,0.0003710043,0.00009878755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008634879,0.0001246844,0.00001405621,0.0007712212,0.0005343669,0.00005539352,0.0001300794,0.0004645681,0.00001126122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004541105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001199958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004831881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004396952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998938,0.00003245358,0.0001566418,0.0003427687,0.0001185316,0.0004116482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994239,0.00003955765,0.00005013214,0.000302877,0.00003056553,0.000152982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007995321,0.0001990262,0.7752252,0.000001326108,0.00003170849,0.000113646,0.02184443,4.728737e-8,0.00002614811,0.008655053,0.001553236,0.1923422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022435,0.0007283663,0.08017968,0.00001988209,0.0001101889,0.0004482266,0.3975364,5.32574e-7,0.0001428565,0.0537051,0.4641477,0.0007375678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790689,0.0002202239,0.00001213289,0.01870595,0.0005173786,0.0004107503,3.911659e-7,0.0004602229,0.0006040331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974645,0.00006041075,0.0006495765,0.0001047571,0.00009393261,0.0001270058,3.296362e-7,0.00001048474,0.00148897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6950455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5084482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02439058302944965,"score_gpt":0.3117186319874462,"score_spread":0.2873280489579966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}