{"id":"W2133336922","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpn017","title":"Working together: a reciprocal wood flow arrangement to mitigate the economic impacts of natural disturbance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Environmental science; Flow (mathematics); Mountain pine beetle; Economic impact analysis; Ecology; Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economics; Forestry; Mathematics; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001236432,0.0001389024,0.0001738543,0.0002084374,0.0001990278,0.00008276087,0.001649682,0.00004846753,0.001390369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001765803,0.00009591507,0.0001445339,0.0002413084,0.0004715054,0.0005232927,0.0004030028,0.0004891255,0.0004362042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004986534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009478772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000549352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000550729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975375,0.0001434088,0.0004786785,0.0001996474,0.001231704,0.0004090794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999014,0.0001505077,0.0002322329,0.0002883291,0.0001039642,0.0002110137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001478055,0.0002163292,0.8916898,0.0000110933,0.0002186928,0.0002021237,0.002720554,0.05484506,0.0003029805,0.002294665,0.03431636,0.01170433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00112252,0.001128507,0.8957707,0.0002039128,0.00001499873,0.000253593,0.0001352502,0.008578302,0.0008689592,0.002682279,0.08898874,0.0002522774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906504,0.00006334009,0.00004687176,0.001574916,0.0005628677,0.0002270517,0.000008148108,0.000006076145,0.00686035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961666,0.00008118687,0.0006609338,0.0001140816,0.0007082789,0.00001187828,0.000006780363,0.00001607859,0.002234201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05467238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04243439526527595,"score_gpt":0.3375178432396703,"score_spread":0.2950834479743944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}