{"id":"W2133336922","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpn017","title":"Working together: a reciprocal wood flow arrangement to mitigate the economic impacts of natural disturbance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Environmental science; Flow (mathematics); Mountain pine beetle; Economic impact analysis; Ecology; Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economics; Forestry; Mathematics; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009322464,0.0002535646,0.0001873058,0.0004086983,0.0007836101,0.0009731195,0.0008623538,0.0003953778,0.003602663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001820053,0.0001598999,0.0002707039,0.000361774,0.0007824066,0.001599655,0.001099152,0.0004482329,0.0003144529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008869996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00136086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01685075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994985,0.0001880727,0.00001460381,0.00008294662,0.00008220637,0.0001336496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995633,0.00006926941,0.0001174778,0.00008416097,0.0000524957,0.000113257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007118587,0.001243522,0.05184966,0.00008883783,0.0001464287,0.0005866854,0.001713015,0.6588194,0.01062976,0.06816041,0.002452291,0.2035981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004891273,0.002212999,0.08046301,0.00006239156,0.0002039987,0.0003841863,0.004237927,0.800867,0.007608017,0.07061296,0.03273067,0.0001277088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8919975,0.00004414305,0.08515409,0.0003295317,0.00002625841,0.000225424,0.00006145177,0.0002950273,0.02186655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987389,0.00002364209,0.01102506,0.00002408116,0.000005505736,0.00003800647,0.00002816393,0.00001082084,0.001455824],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01685075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03350532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04243439526527595,"score_gpt":0.3375178432396703,"score_spread":0.2950834479743944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}