{"id":"W2133483174","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00306.x","title":"Occupancy‐abundance relationships and sampling scales","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service","keywords":"Occupancy; Abundance (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Ecology; Scale (ratio); Statistics; Temperate climate; Relative abundance distribution; Environmental science; Spatial ecology; Biology; Relative species abundance; Mathematics; Geography; Cartography; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001195975,0.00005793853,0.00005912819,0.00002593277,0.0003855906,0.00001102519,0.00004773824,0.00003645602,0.0007693294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001396044,0.00005610151,0.00002635705,0.0001738797,0.0002283685,0.0001125765,0.00002252349,0.00008939401,0.0003227366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007177143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":8.363751e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001128397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000654622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995669,0.00002790562,0.00008686348,0.0001536645,0.00004839481,0.0001162685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997824,0.00008649157,0.00002030144,0.00007489038,0.000002160225,0.00003376952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003500621,0.00001274349,0.9906082,0.000001637359,0.000006781335,5.464789e-7,0.0002151442,0.0002550259,0.00001266708,0.000439209,0.0002477124,0.008196814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007937391,0.00001158976,0.984896,0.000002995093,0.000004894122,0.000002178723,0.00003339895,0.0003680526,0.000003577597,0.008816122,0.005708701,0.00007313899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709434,0.0003570272,0.0002658759,0.0002354141,0.00003642875,0.00005546372,0.000002726948,0.00003584811,0.02806784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952154,0.0003375764,0.003836164,0.0001449856,0.00001118709,0.00001012356,0.000002633592,0.000003737705,0.0004381688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02762967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8423618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01734594568876113,"score_gpt":0.2372682073263214,"score_spread":0.2199222616375603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}